Week 1 (Jun 3): Broadly Applicable Techniques (Su19)

This week, you will learn about postmodernism and its significance in music scholarship. You will also learn about narrative theory in literature and how it applies to music analysis.

Intertextuality

This video introduces the concepts of intertextuality and postmodernism and articulates their significance in academic music studies. Works cited: .

Note: This video uses interactive technology. The picture-in-picture can be swapped or even viewed side-by-side. The video also uses a menu so you can quickly navigate to certain portions of the video. For more explanation, see this video from Kaltura.

download intertextuality slidesdownload intertextuality video captions/transcript

Narrative theory

Watch my instructional video on the basics of narrative theory for music, based on .

Note: This video uses interactive technology. The picture-in-picture can be swapped or even viewed side-by-side. The video also uses a menu so you can quickly navigate to certain portions of the video. For more explanation, see this video from Kaltura.

Complete the Concept Check quiz on Blackboard to see if you are understanding the basics of narrative properly.

download narrative slidesdownload narrative video captions/transcript

Due Wednesday: Response

Write a response essay (NB: NOT a summary!) to my intertextuality video, at least 700 words long.

More on response essays
A response essay is your personal take on the readings, and thus you shouldn’t be trying to write the “right answer,” but rather your opinion and reaction to what you’ve read. Remember that these are graded pass/fail, so anything you write is valuable in that sense. Feel free to use I/me pronouns and to freely express yourself (while remaining professional) and your opinion of the reading.

Here are some optional prompts for your essay:

  • Why is composer intent given so much importance in performance settings (private lessons, ensembles, etc.)? Why is this so different from how academia treats composer intent?
  • One common underlying assumption in composer-intent-based analyses is that the composition is reflective of the composer’s life—but of course, composers write music for many reasons. Give examples of other kinds of inspiration for compositions (or any other creative art) that are not based on lived experience. It might be helpful to note specific pieces.
  • “Fan theories” are kind of like the sort of literary criticism Barthes’s work makes possible—fan theories are fun to read even though they may not have anything to do with the author’s intent. Do you have a fan theory about a well-known movie, book, TV show, etc. that you enjoy even though it’s not “canon“?

Submit this by posting in your group’s “blog” on Blackboard.

Due Friday: Peer response

Respond to the members of your peer group by clicking the “comment” button under their blog post and typing your response directly into the text box, rather than uploading an attachment.

Due Sunday: Analysis assignment

You will analyze Chopin’s prelude in C minor from the Op. 28 preludes. This Chopin prelude is short and in a simple texture, yet full of narrative implications.

Instructions

1. listening

Listen to recordings of the prelude several times while following along with the score, to get the music in your ears. This is a very short piece, so it will not take long.

Here are two recordings:

2. Identifying motives
Chopin motives a and b
has analyzed this piece as being based on two overlapping motives, which are both found in the melody of measure 1: motive a, a neighbor-note figure in quarter notes, and motive b, a stepwise descending figure with the dotted rhythm. This is shown in the picture on the right.

Go through the rest of the prelude and try to identify the fragments that can be based on motive or motive b. 

3. analysis

Now, try to create a narrative through the relationship between motives and as they develop through the piece. You can think of a and almost as two characters in a story.

Here is a starting point for you: in measure 1, think of these two characters (the motives) as being in cooperation with one another. The motives overlap nicely, and together they outline the tonic C minor triad. This gives a definite sense of gloom and lamentation.

For your analysis, write a short essay (<500 words) that answers the following questions:

  • Which motive represents order, and which represents transgression?
  • Which side of this battle (between transgression/order) do you, as the listener, sympathize with?
  • Which narrative archetype does this piece represent: romance, tragedy, comedy, or irony?
  • Why did you choose this archetype—in which passages does either order or transgression seem to be “in charge”?

In addition to tracing the motives, here are other elements that you may consider in any narrative analysis (this also comes from Almén):

  • Spatial and temporal aspects of the piece. For example: registral shifts or gaps, changes in a prevailing or normative key or rhythm, etc.
  • Any change or development in a musical parameter. For exmample: the sense of increasing momentum associated with accelerando passages.
  • Any programmatic associations linked with themes, motives, textures, or with the work as a whole.
  • Expressive markings as coloration of other meaningful events. For example: when extra emphasis is implied by a crescendo or marcato marking.
  • The use of text, descriptive titles, or supplemental explanatory material, when appropriate.

Grading

  • You will be assessed on the following concepts:
    • Good identification of motives throughout the entire piece
    • Proper application of order/transgression concepts
    • Good support for narrative archetype
  • You will be given detailed feedback through the rubric. Click “View rubric” in the gradebook to access this.
  • Assignments are always graded pass/fail, with a threshold of 70% to pass.

Submission

  • Submit only your short essay. There is no need to submit a separate score, but make sure it’s clear what aspects of the score you are referring to by using measure numbers, pitch names, etc.
  • Submit your assignment on Canvas.
  • Upload your assignment as a .pdf attachment. Please do not use other file types.

Video feedback on assignments

In this short video, I clarify what sympathy does in a narrative analysis, and show the development of the a and b motives.

download feedback transcript

Bibliography

(The Almén is not found in our Readings folder because I don’t want you to look at it! Analyze the Chopin piece on your own, without consulting outside resources.)

Bibliography

If articles are not available online, you should be able to find them in the Readings folder on Teams.

Keyboard editors. 2003. “DX7 Redux? 20 Years Later, the DX7 Still Resonates.” Keyboard, July 2003.
12tone. 2018. Is Rap Music? YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvmm0f92L-k.
Abel, Richard. 1993. French Film Theory and Criticism: A History - Anthology; 1907 - 1939. Vol. 1: 1907 - 1929. 1. Princeton paperback print. Princeton Paperbacks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Adams, Kyle. 2009. “On the Metrical Techniques of Flow in Rap Music.” Music Theory Online 15 (5). http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.09.15.5/mto.09.15.5.adams.html.
Adams, Kyle. 2015. “What Did Danger Mouse Do? The Grey Album and Musical Composition in Configurable Culture.” Music Theory Spectrum 37 (1): 7–24.
Adams, Doug, Fran Walsh, and Howard Shore. 2010. The Music of The Lord of the Rings Films: A Comprehensive Account of Howard Shore’s Scores. 1 edition. Van Nuys, Calif: Alfred Music.
Adewunmi, Bim. 2014. “Band Aid 30: Clumsy, Patronising and Wrong in so Many Ways.” The Guardian, November 11, 2014, sec. world news. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/11/band-aid-30-patronising-bob-geldof-ebola-do-they-know-its-christmas.
Aebersold, Jamey. 2000. Jazz Handbook. New Albany, IN: Jamey Aebersold Jazz.
Aebersold, Jamey. 1974. The II–V7–I Progression. Vol. 3. Jamey Aebersold Play-A-Long Series. New Albany, IN: Jamey Aebersold Jazz.
Agawu, V. Kofi. 1991. Playing with Signs: A Semiotic Interpretation of Classic Music. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Agawu, Kofi. 1995. “The Invention of ‘African Rhythm.’” Journal of the American Musicological Society 48 (3): 380–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3519832.
Agazzari, Agostino. (1607) 1998. “Of Playing upon a Bass with All Instruments and of Their Use in a Consort.” In Source Readings in Music History, edited by Oliver Strunk and Leo Treitler, translated by Oliver Strunk, 622–8. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Alcalde, Bruno Moschini. 2017. “Patterns of Hybridity: An Analytical Framework for Pluralist Music.” Ph.D. diss., Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
Aldwell, Edward, Carl Schachter, and Allen Clayton Cadwallader. 2011. Harmony & Voice Leading. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Schirmer/Cengage Learning.
Alim, H. Samy. 2006. Roc the Mic Right: The Language of Hip Hop Culture. 1 edition. New York: Routledge.
Alim, H. Samy, Jooyoung Lee, and Lauren Mason Carris. 2010. “‘Short Fried-Rice-Eating Chinese MCs’ and ‘Good-Hair-Havin Uncle Tom Niggas’: Performing Race and Ethnicity in Freestyle Rap Battles.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20 (1): 116–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01052.x.
Allanbrook, Wye Jamison. 1992. “Two Threads through the Labyrinth: Topic and Process in the First Movements of K. 332 and K. 333.” In Convention in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Music: Essays in Honor of Leonard G. Ratner, edited by Wye Jamison Allanbrook, Janet M. Levy, and William P. Mahrt, 125–71. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press.
Alluri, Vinoo, and Petri Toiviainen. 2012. “Effect of Enculturation on the Semantic and Acoustic Correlates of Polyphonic Timbre.” Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 29 (3): 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.29.3.297.
Almén, Byron. 2003. “Narrative Archetypes: A Critique, Theory, and Method of Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Music Theory 47 (1): 1–39.
Anderson, Virgil Antris. 1977. Training the Speaking Voice. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderton, Craig. 2003. “Tracking FM Synths: 20-Year-Old Tips Still Give Modern Tracks Punch.” Keyboard, July 2003.
Appen, Ralf von, André Doehring, Dietrich Helms, and Allan F. Moore, eds. 2015. Song Interpretation in 21st-Century Pop Music. Ashgate Popular and Folk Music Series. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Ariza, Christopher. 2011. “Two Pioneering Projects from the Early History of Computer-Aided Algorithmic Composition.” Computer Music Journal 35 (3): 40–56.
Armbruster, Greg. 1986. “David Briggs: The Man with the Keys to Music City.” Keyboard, October 1986.
Ashley, Richard, and Renee Timmers, eds. 2017. The Routledge Companion to Music Cognition. 1 edition. Routledge.
Attas, Robin. 2011. “Sarah Setting the Terms: Defining Phrase in Popular Music.” Music Theory Online 17 (3). http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.11.17.3/mto.11.17.3.attas.html.
Attas, Robin. 2015. “Form as Process: The Buildup Introduction in Popular Music.” Music Theory Spectrum 37 (2): 275–296.
Austerlitz, Saul. 2014. “The Pernicious Rise of Poptimism.” The New York Times, April 4, 2014, sec. Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/magazine/the-pernicious-rise-of-poptimism.html.
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words: Second Edition. Edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà. 2 edition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Axis of Awesome. 2011. 4 Chords. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb4jjgJb5rtQqQN5GcypFow.
Baccigalupo, Claudio. 2003. “Design and Production of Audio Technologies for Video Games Development.” M.S. thesis, Milan: Università degli Studi di Milano.
Bain, Jennifer. 2008. “‘Messy Structure’? Multiple Tonal Centers in the Music of Machaut.” Music Theory Spectrum 30 (2): 195–237. https://doi.org/10.1525/mts.2008.30.2.195.
Baker, Houston A. 1991. “Hybridity, the Rap Race, and Pedagogy for the 1990s.” Black Music Research Journal 11 (2): 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/779267.
Bannister, Richard. 2016. “Software: Audio Overload.” Personal website. 2016. http://www.bannister.org/software/ao.htm.
Barna, Alyssa. n.d. “Music Theory’s Role in Mainstream Digital Journalism.” Paper.
Barna, Alyssa. 2018. “The Dance Chorus in Recent Top-40 Music.” Paper presented at the Music Theory Southeast, Columbia, South Carolina, March 2.
Barthes, Roland. (1957) 1972. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers. New York: The Noonday Press.
Barthes, Roland. (1968) 1989. “The Death of the Author.” In The Rustle of Language, translated by Richard Howard. University of California Press.
Barthes, Roland, and Stephen Heath. 1987. Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana Press.
Bates, Ian. 2012. “Vaughan Williams’s Five Variants of ‘Dives and Lazarus’ : A Study of the Composer’s Approach to Diatonic Organization.” Music Theory Spectrum 34 (1): 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1525/mts.2012.34.1.34.
Bates, Eliot. 2012. “What Studios Do.” Journal on the Art of Record Production, no. 7 (November).
Beach, David. 2012. Analysis of 18th- and 19th-Century Musical Works in the Classical Tradition. 1 edition. New York, NY ; Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Bennett, Jessica. 2014. “How to Reclaim the F-Word? Just Call Beyoncé.” Time, August 26, 2014. http://time.com/3181644/beyonce-reclaim-feminism-pop-star/.
Bennett, Samantha. 2015. “Never Mind the Bollocks : A Tech-Processual Analysis.” Popular Music and Society 38 (4): 466–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2015.1034508.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Unknown edition. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
Bennett, Samantha. 2016. “Gus Dudgeon’s Super Sonic Signature.” In Global Glam and Popular Music: Style and Spectacle from the 1970s to the 2000s, edited by Ian Chapman and Henry Johnson, 1 edition, 55–68. London: Routledge.
Bennett, Samantha, and Eliot Bates, eds. 2018. Critical Approaches to the Production of Music and Sound. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Berger, Kenneth W. 1964. “Some Factors in the Recognition of Timbre.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36 (10): 1888–91. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1919287.
Berk, Mike. 2000. “Technology: Analog Fetishes and Digital Futures.” In Modulations: A History of Electronic Music: Throbbing Words on Sound, edited by Peter Shapiro, Simon Reynolds, and David Toop, 188–209. New York: Caipirinha Productions.
Berman, Judy. 2017. “How Netflix’s ‘GLOW’ Escapes ’80s Soundtrack Cliché.” Pitchfork. June 27, 2017. https://pitchfork.com/thepitch/netflix-glow-music-supervision-escapes-80s-soundtrack-cliche/.