Week 4 (Sep 12): Serialism (F22)

This week you will learn about 12-tone serial techniques and the variety of ways this can be implemented. You’ll learn how to identify row forms, do a row count, make a matrix, and interpret serial pieces. You will also do a guided analysis of a piece by You’ll be analyzing the first movement of Ernst Krenek’s Suite for Solo Cello, Op. 84.

Serialism

Introductory video

I have made a video based on Chapter 6 of . If the video is not detailed enough for you, you can download this chapter from the Readings folder, and I have placed the whole book on reserve at the library.

download serialism slidesdownload serialism transcriptlink to video

Concept check

Optional: Complete the Concept Check quiz on Blackboard to see if you are understanding these concepts.

Due Thursday: Reading and response

Read Straus’s model analysis of a segment of Webern’s String Quartet, Op. 28, Variation 4 on pages 342–347. Variation 4 begins at 2:16 in the recording below.

In the Reading Responses channel on Teams, post a message with some type of response about the readings/videos. You may either make a new post or reply to someone else’s post (both count for this participation grade). You can approach this in a bunch of different ways! You might ask clarifying questions about the reading, summarize an important bit of it, share a related personal anecdote…anything counts, as long as it relates to the reading in some way.

More on response essays
A response essay is your personal take on the readings, and thus you shouldn’t be trying to write the “right answer,” but rather your opinion and reaction to what you’ve read. Remember that these are graded pass/fail, so anything you write is valuable in that sense. Feel free to use I/me pronouns and to freely express yourself (while remaining professional) and your opinion of the reading.

Below are some questions to inspire you, which you may choose to answer (you do not have to answer all, or any, of them!):

  • A common critique of serial music is that no one can hear the structure. How do you feel this critique applies to this piece? Can you hear the structure after reading the analysis, or not?
  • What to you was the most compelling and interesting part of the analysis?

Due Sunday*: Student Choice Assignment

* Student Choice Assignments are not required for everyone. You only need to complete this week’s analysis if this is one of your three chosen assignments. Student Choice Assignments are explained further on the syllabus.

You’ll be analyzing the first movement of Ernst Krenek’s Suite for Solo Cello, Op. 84. The score can be found in the Readings folder.

Instructions

  • Before looking at the serial pitch content, listen to the piece several times to determine phrase boundaries.
  • The piece uses the P2 row exclusively throughout. With this in mind, you should be able to quickly find the beginnings of each row.
  • Write a brief essay ≤500 words in which you discuss the following, giving specific examples (reference measure numbers, pitches, etc) in each case:
    • How are phrase boundaries articulated?
    • How do the row boundaries align with the phrase boundaries (or not)?
    • What other pitches, pcs, pc sets, or set classes seem to be important in this piece?
    • How does your understanding of these organizing principles (serialism, set theory) impact your hearing/experience of the piece?

Grading

  • You will be assessed on the following concepts:
    • Identification of phrase boundaries
    • Comparison of row/phrase boundaries
    • Identification of other significant pitch techniques
    • Description of listening experience
  • You will be given detailed feedback through the rubric. Click “View rubric” in the gradebook to access this.
  • Assignments are always graded pass/fail, with a threshold of 70% to pass.

Submission

  • Submit only your short essay.
  • Submit your assignment on Blackboard.
  • Upload your assignment as a .pdf attachment. Please do not use other file types.

Bibliography

Bibliography

If articles are not available online, you should be able to find them in the Readings folder on Teams.

Keyboard editors. 2003. “DX7 Redux? 20 Years Later, the DX7 Still Resonates.” Keyboard, July 2003.
12tone. 2018. Is Rap Music? YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvmm0f92L-k.
Abel, Richard. 1993. French Film Theory and Criticism: A History - Anthology; 1907 - 1939. Vol. 1: 1907 - 1929. 1. Princeton paperback print. Princeton Paperbacks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Adams, Kyle. 2009. “On the Metrical Techniques of Flow in Rap Music.” Music Theory Online 15 (5). http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.09.15.5/mto.09.15.5.adams.html.
Adams, Kyle. 2015. “What Did Danger Mouse Do? The Grey Album and Musical Composition in Configurable Culture.” Music Theory Spectrum 37 (1): 7–24.
Adams, Doug, Fran Walsh, and Howard Shore. 2010. The Music of The Lord of the Rings Films: A Comprehensive Account of Howard Shore’s Scores. 1 edition. Van Nuys, Calif: Alfred Music.
Adewunmi, Bim. 2014. “Band Aid 30: Clumsy, Patronising and Wrong in so Many Ways.” The Guardian, November 11, 2014, sec. world news. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/11/band-aid-30-patronising-bob-geldof-ebola-do-they-know-its-christmas.
Aebersold, Jamey. 2000. Jazz Handbook. New Albany, IN: Jamey Aebersold Jazz.
Aebersold, Jamey. 1974. The II–V7–I Progression. Vol. 3. Jamey Aebersold Play-A-Long Series. New Albany, IN: Jamey Aebersold Jazz.
Agawu, V. Kofi. 1991. Playing with Signs: A Semiotic Interpretation of Classic Music. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Agawu, Kofi. 1995. “The Invention of ‘African Rhythm.’” Journal of the American Musicological Society 48 (3): 380–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3519832.
Agazzari, Agostino. (1607) 1998. “Of Playing upon a Bass with All Instruments and of Their Use in a Consort.” In Source Readings in Music History, edited by Oliver Strunk and Leo Treitler, translated by Oliver Strunk, 622–8. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Alcalde, Bruno Moschini. 2017. “Patterns of Hybridity: An Analytical Framework for Pluralist Music.” Ph.D. diss., Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
Aldwell, Edward, Carl Schachter, and Allen Clayton Cadwallader. 2011. Harmony & Voice Leading. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Schirmer/Cengage Learning.
Alim, H. Samy. 2006. Roc the Mic Right: The Language of Hip Hop Culture. 1 edition. New York: Routledge.
Alim, H. Samy, Jooyoung Lee, and Lauren Mason Carris. 2010. “‘Short Fried-Rice-Eating Chinese MCs’ and ‘Good-Hair-Havin Uncle Tom Niggas’: Performing Race and Ethnicity in Freestyle Rap Battles.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20 (1): 116–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01052.x.
Allanbrook, Wye Jamison. 1992. “Two Threads through the Labyrinth: Topic and Process in the First Movements of K. 332 and K. 333.” In Convention in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Music: Essays in Honor of Leonard G. Ratner, edited by Wye Jamison Allanbrook, Janet M. Levy, and William P. Mahrt, 125–71. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press.
Alluri, Vinoo, and Petri Toiviainen. 2012. “Effect of Enculturation on the Semantic and Acoustic Correlates of Polyphonic Timbre.” Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 29 (3): 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.29.3.297.
Almén, Byron. 2003. “Narrative Archetypes: A Critique, Theory, and Method of Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Music Theory 47 (1): 1–39.
Anderson, Virgil Antris. 1977. Training the Speaking Voice. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderton, Craig. 2003. “Tracking FM Synths: 20-Year-Old Tips Still Give Modern Tracks Punch.” Keyboard, July 2003.
Appen, Ralf von, André Doehring, Dietrich Helms, and Allan F. Moore, eds. 2015. Song Interpretation in 21st-Century Pop Music. Ashgate Popular and Folk Music Series. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Ariza, Christopher. 2011. “Two Pioneering Projects from the Early History of Computer-Aided Algorithmic Composition.” Computer Music Journal 35 (3): 40–56.
Armbruster, Greg. 1986. “David Briggs: The Man with the Keys to Music City.” Keyboard, October 1986.
Ashley, Richard, and Renee Timmers, eds. 2017. The Routledge Companion to Music Cognition. 1 edition. Routledge.
Attas, Robin. 2011. “Sarah Setting the Terms: Defining Phrase in Popular Music.” Music Theory Online 17 (3). http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.11.17.3/mto.11.17.3.attas.html.
Attas, Robin. 2015. “Form as Process: The Buildup Introduction in Popular Music.” Music Theory Spectrum 37 (2): 275–296.
Austerlitz, Saul. 2014. “The Pernicious Rise of Poptimism.” The New York Times, April 4, 2014, sec. Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/magazine/the-pernicious-rise-of-poptimism.html.
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words: Second Edition. Edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà. 2 edition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Axis of Awesome. 2011. 4 Chords. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb4jjgJb5rtQqQN5GcypFow.
Baccigalupo, Claudio. 2003. “Design and Production of Audio Technologies for Video Games Development.” M.S. thesis, Milan: Università degli Studi di Milano.
Bain, Jennifer. 2008. “‘Messy Structure’? Multiple Tonal Centers in the Music of Machaut.” Music Theory Spectrum 30 (2): 195–237. https://doi.org/10.1525/mts.2008.30.2.195.
Baker, Houston A. 1991. “Hybridity, the Rap Race, and Pedagogy for the 1990s.” Black Music Research Journal 11 (2): 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/779267.
Bannister, Richard. 2016. “Software: Audio Overload.” Personal website. 2016. http://www.bannister.org/software/ao.htm.
Barna, Alyssa. n.d. “Music Theory’s Role in Mainstream Digital Journalism.” Paper.
Barna, Alyssa. 2018. “The Dance Chorus in Recent Top-40 Music.” Paper presented at the Music Theory Southeast, Columbia, South Carolina, March 2.
Barthes, Roland. (1957) 1972. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers. New York: The Noonday Press.
Barthes, Roland. (1968) 1989. “The Death of the Author.” In The Rustle of Language, translated by Richard Howard. University of California Press.
Barthes, Roland, and Stephen Heath. 1987. Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana Press.
Bates, Ian. 2012. “Vaughan Williams’s Five Variants of ‘Dives and Lazarus’ : A Study of the Composer’s Approach to Diatonic Organization.” Music Theory Spectrum 34 (1): 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1525/mts.2012.34.1.34.
Bates, Eliot. 2012. “What Studios Do.” Journal on the Art of Record Production, no. 7 (November).
Beach, David. 2012. Analysis of 18th- and 19th-Century Musical Works in the Classical Tradition. 1 edition. New York, NY ; Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Bennett, Jessica. 2014. “How to Reclaim the F-Word? Just Call Beyoncé.” Time, August 26, 2014. http://time.com/3181644/beyonce-reclaim-feminism-pop-star/.
Bennett, Samantha. 2015. “Never Mind the Bollocks : A Tech-Processual Analysis.” Popular Music and Society 38 (4): 466–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2015.1034508.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Unknown edition. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
Bennett, Samantha. 2016. “Gus Dudgeon’s Super Sonic Signature.” In Global Glam and Popular Music: Style and Spectacle from the 1970s to the 2000s, edited by Ian Chapman and Henry Johnson, 1 edition, 55–68. London: Routledge.
Bennett, Samantha, and Eliot Bates, eds. 2018. Critical Approaches to the Production of Music and Sound. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Berger, Kenneth W. 1964. “Some Factors in the Recognition of Timbre.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36 (10): 1888–91. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1919287.
Berk, Mike. 2000. “Technology: Analog Fetishes and Digital Futures.” In Modulations: A History of Electronic Music: Throbbing Words on Sound, edited by Peter Shapiro, Simon Reynolds, and David Toop, 188–209. New York: Caipirinha Productions.
Berman, Judy. 2017. “How Netflix’s ‘GLOW’ Escapes ’80s Soundtrack Cliché.” Pitchfork. June 27, 2017. https://pitchfork.com/thepitch/netflix-glow-music-supervision-escapes-80s-soundtrack-cliche/.